Shanti Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.890 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15445 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.
Shanti Prasad Singh Son of Late Narsingh Prasad Singh Resident of VillageGarva Kasaura, P.S. Kasuara, District-Munger. 2.
Bhushan Singh Son of Late Bitan Singh Resident of Billage- BIhari, P.O. Jamui, P.S. Jamui, District-Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through Sri Anjani Kumar Singh, The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2.
Sri Anjani KUmar Singh Presently the Chief Secretary, Government of BIhar, Patna.
3.
Sri R.N. Chauthu, Presently Posted as the Principal Secretary, Educatio Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
Sri Rajiv Prasad Singh (Ranjan), Presently Posted as the Director, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.
5.
Sri Ravi BHushan Pandey, Presently Posted as the Joint Secretary, Education Department, BIhar, Patna.
6.
Smt. Pratibha Kumari Presently Posted as the Joint Secretary, Education Department, BIhar, Patna.
7.
Sri Vijay Kumar HImanshu, Presently Posted as the District Education Officer, Jamui.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Aashutosh Ranjan Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-07-2023 Heard the parties.
The present petition has been preferred for compliance of the order dated 31.08.2017 passed in CWJC No. 15445 of 2016 by which the direction was given to the authorities to consider the case of the petitioner and dispose it of after giving a hearing.
Patna High Court MJC No.890 of 2018(3) dt.13-07-2023 2/2 A show cause of opposite party no. 6, Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division, Munger has been filed bringing on record memo no. 506 dated 09.05.2018 by which a reasoned order has been passed.
In that view of the matter, no contempt is made out, the petitioner, if he so wants, can agitate the matter. The MJC 890 of 2018 stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U