Mukesh Kumar Ojha v. Sri Pankaj Kumar The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.177 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11563 of 2015 ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Ojha, son of Dhrub Nath Ojha, Resident of village- Sheosagar Satpipara, Post & P.S.- Ramgarhwa, District- East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Sri Pankaj Kumar, the State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Shri Pankaj Kumar, the Secretary, Department of Food & Civil Supply, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Shri Pankaj Kumar, the Managing Director, Bihar State Food Cooperative, Patna.

4. Shri Arbind Kumar Singh, the Managing Director, Bihar State Corporation Bank Limited, Patna.

5. Shri Atul Prasad, the Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

6. Shri Anupam Kumar, the District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

7. Shri Sri Kumar Mangalm, the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, East Champaran, Motihari.

8. Shri Vakil Pandey, the District Supply Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.

9. Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav, the District Development Commissioner, East Champaran, Motihari.

10. Shri Brinder Saran, the District Co-operative Officer East Champaran, Motihari.

11. Srimati Sri Prakash, the Sub Divisional Officer, Raxual, District- East Champaran, Motihari.

12. Smt. Pramila Kumari, the Block Development Officer, Ramgarhwa, Sub - Division- Ruxaul, District - East Champaran, Motihari.

13. Shri Sunil Kumar, the Block Supply Officer, Block Ramgarhwa, Sub Division - Raxual, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 For the Corporation : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 09-01-2019 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Counsel for the State and Corporation are present.

Vide judgment and order passed in CWJC No.11563 of 2015, certain directions were issued to the respondentCorporation. The Corporation went in appeal against the

Patna High Court MJC No.177 of 2016(4) dt.09-01-2019 2/2 judgment and order of this Court giving rise to LPA No.867 of 2016 and the Division Bench vide judgment and order passed in the batch of appeals arising from LPA No.881 of 2016 including the appeal arising from the order which is subject matter of this proceeding, has proceeded to modify the judgment and order of this Court with further direction to constitute a committee. In view of the modification so directed by the Division Bench, the order of this Court stands merged with the order of the Division Bench and in case the writ petitioner feels aggrieved on any issue, his contempt remedy would lie elsewhere and not before this Court. If so advised, he can take recourse thereto.

With the observation above, the contempt application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) skpathak/- U