Patna High CourtCWJC/936/2016dismissed

Ram Vinod Sahni v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-07Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.936 of 2016 ====================================================== Ram Vinod Sahni son of late Ram Lakhan Sahni resident of Village - Siswara, P.S Katra, district Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Co-operative Department Bihar Patna.

2. Registrar, Co-operative society Bihar Patna.

3. Joint Registrar Co-operative Society, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. .......Respondent 1st Party

4. Katra Prakhand Matasyajivi Sahyog Samiti Limited, having its office at Katra, P.S Katra, District Muzaffarpur through its so called secretary, Rajju Sahni ......Respondent 2nd party

5. Siya Saran Sahni son of Bahadur Sahni Resident of Village- Pahsaul, P.S Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

6. Singheshwar Sahni son of Manour Sahni Resident of Village- Puprauli, P.S Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

7. Ram Shiv Sahani Son of Pritam Sahni Resident of Village- Sanhauli, P.S Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

8. Rajju Sahni son of Pachkauri Sahni Resident of Village- Tenwarda , P.s Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

9. Mohan Sahni Son of late Ramnandn Sahni Resident of Village- Nawada P.s Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

10. Jitendra Sahni son of Parikshan Sahni Resident of Village+P.S- Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

11. Pramod Sahni son of Bilas Sahni Resident of Village- Dargah, P.s Katra, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent 3nd party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, SC-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.936 of 2016 (3) dt.07-08-2018 07-08-2018 At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to efflux of time this writ petition filed by the petitioner for quashing the order dated 22.11.2014 passed by the respondent no.3 as well as the order dated 16.10.2015/30.10.2015 passed by the respondent no.2 so far as it relates to Revision No. 98 of 2015 as contained in Annexure3 has become infructuous. In view of the submission made above, the application is dismissed as infructuous.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/SkSuman.