← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1110/2018disposed

Rashtriya Vidhi Nagrik Siksha Karyakaram Through Its Director Sudhir Kumar Bhaskar v. The State Of Bihar Through Anjani Kumar Singh, Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2022-02-09Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1110 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.661 of 2017 ====================================================== Rashtriya Vidhi Nagrik Siksha Karyakaram Through Its Director Sudhir Kumar Bhaskar Son of Sri Ram Pandey, R/o Village- Gaya Chand Chaura, P.S.- Civil Lines, District Gaya, at present residing at Road No. 1, Gardanibagh, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Anjani Kumar Singh, Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors 2.

Sri R.K. Mahajan,The Principal Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri M. Ram Chandrudu The Director, Primary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner does not deny the fact that the Court's order dated 11.12.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 661 of 2017, violation of which has been complained in the present contempt application, has been complied with.

Mr. Dinu Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, however, seeks liberty to challenge the decision taken by the opposite parties in compliance of the said

Patna High Court MJC No.1110 of 2018(4) dt.09-02-2022 2/2 order dated 11.12.2017.

Since the order has been complied with, the contempt proceeding stands dropped.

The petitioner shall be at liberty to question the correctness of the decision of the opposite parties, as sought for. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U