Patna High CourtCWJC/1066/2016withdrawn

Krishna Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-18Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1066 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Krishna Bhagat, son of Shri Mangaru Bhagat, resident of VillageBartawalia, P.O- Itawa, P.S.- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan at present posted and working as Panchayat Teacher in Government Primary School, Nathanpura, Block- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Education Officer, Siwan.

3. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan.

4. The Block Education Officer, Pachrukhi, District- Siwan.

5. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Bharatpur, Block- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan.

6. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Raj, Bhartapura, BlockPachrukhi, District- Siwan.

7. The Headmaster-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer of Government Primary School, Nathanpura, Block- Pachrukhi, District- Siwan. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc27- Kinkar Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to file Appeal before District Teachers Appellate Tribunal, Siwan in view of Rule 18 of Bihar Panchayati Elementary Teacher Employment and Service Condition Rules, 2008.

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

It is further directed in case petitioner files an Appeal within

Patna High Court CWJC No.1066 of 2016 (3) dt.18-09-2018 2/2 a period of two weeks from today, the Appellate Authority would consider the case of the petitioner on its own merits and would not be impeded by the issue of limitation.

It is needless to state that the Appellate Tribunal would make all endeavours to dispose of the case of the petitioner within a period of four months from today in accordance with law. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Sanjeev/- U