← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18725/2018dismissed

Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Shashi Bhushan Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-11-01Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18725 of 2018 ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Shashi Bhushan Kumar Tiwari Son of Shiv Shankar Tiwari, Resident of Village- Karanmeya, Ward No. 6, Lalgarh, Police Station Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Managing Director, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5.

The Principal, Government Medical College and Hospital, West Champaran at Bettiah.

6.

The Civil Surgeon, M.J.K. Hospital, West Champaran at Bettiah. 7.

The Superintendent, M.J.K. Hospital, West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ravi Kumar, AC to GP-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-11-2022 It is the specific stand of the State in supplementary affidavit that walk-in interview pursuant to the advertisement dated 28.08.2018 with respect to which the instant writ application has been filed claiming relaxation in age criteria was cancelled due to some irregularities. They have stated in the supplementary counter affidavit that after cancelling the interview no merit list has been published and there is no appointment pursuant to the said advertisement. In view of the above noted developments subsequent

Patna High Court CWJC No.18725 of 2018(13) dt.01-11-2022 2/2 to filing of the writ application, the same has become infructuous.

There is thus no occasion for this Court to express any opinion on the claim of the petitioner for relaxation of the age. The issue is left open for the petitioner to agitate as and when the occasion arises.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U