← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/739/2018disposed

Shyam Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Personal And Administrative Department, Governm

2018-11-28Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.739 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23328 of 2013 ====================================================== Shyam Lal Yadav, S/O Surendra Prasad Yadav, Resident Of Mohalla 151, Sanjay Nagar, New Bigrahpur, P.S. Jakanpur, P.O. G.P.O. and District Patna. presently posted as Junior Research Assistant in Agriculture Research Institute at Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Sudhir Kumar.

2. The Vice Chancellor, Bihar Agriculture University, Sabaur, Bhagalpur, namely Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh.

3. The Director, Bihar Agriculture University, Sabaur, Bhagalpur namely Dr. R. R. Singh.

4. The Regional Director, Agriculture Research Institute, Lohiyanagar, Patna, namely Dr. Arvind Kumar.

5. The Registrar, Bihar Agriculture University, Sabaur, Bhagalpur, namely Dr. R. N. Singh ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Parth Sarthi, G.A. 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

A show cause has been filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2.

It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order dated 05.09.2017 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 23328 of 2013 has already been complied with. The said statements have been made in paragraph nos. 10,

Patna High Court MJC No.739 of 2018(3) dt.28-11-2018 2/2 11, 12 and 13 of the show cause filed on behalf of opposite party no. 2.

Considering the aforesaid facts, no further order is required to be passed in the present application. Accordingly, the present contempt application is disposed of.

The petitioner will be at liberty to approach before the Competent Forum for any other relief, if entitled. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U