Rajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2735 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5980 of 2011 ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad Son of Shri Thakur Mahto, Resident of Village-Puran Kama, Police Station- Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura, at present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Upgraded Middle School Sikandra, District-Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mr. Anjani Kumar, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Chaudhary, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 5.

Md. Mansoor Alam, Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division, Munger.

6.

Mr. Avaneesh Kumar Singh, District Magistrate, Jamui. 7.

Mr. Arun Kumar Thakur, Deputy Development Commissioner-cumChairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Jamui. 8.

Mr. Kapil Dev Tiwari, District Superintendent of Education, Jamui. 9.

Mr. Acharya, District Account Officer, Jamui. 10.

Smt. Bindhu Bhadani, District Treasury Officer, Jamui. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Sarita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sumant Kumar Singh AC to GA-2 Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, GA-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the order dated 04-10-2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5980 of 2011 (Annexure-1), which is the subject matter of the present

Patna High Court MJC No.2735 of 2023(3) dt.31-07-2025 2/2 contempt petition, has already been duly complied with.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order under contempt has now been fully complied with, he seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition as it has become infructuous.

4. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

5. Accordingly, the present M.J.C. application is dismissed as withdrawn, having become infructuous. (Khatim Reza, J) shyambihari/- U