Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64712/2025bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-13Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64712 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Son of Shreekant Singh R/o Village - Bhandajor, P.S. - Roh, Dist. -Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 dated 02.05.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 66, 66B and 66D of I.T. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, On information, police reached the place of occurrence and apprehended two persons, who disclosed their name as Ranjeet Kumar (petitioner) and Shivam Kumar. On search, two mobile phones were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and two mobile phones

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64712 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 2/3 were recovered from the possession of the co-accused, Shivam Kumar. The apprehended accused persons also disclosed that they were engaged in cheating people in the name of Bajaj Finance and Dhani Finance.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on mere suspicion. It is further submitted that there is no complaint against the petitioner by any person regarding cheating. There is no eye-witness to the alleged offence. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 03.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 59

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64712 of 2025(2) dt.13-10-2025 3/3 of 2025, with a condition:- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T