Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71595/2025bail granted

Nagina Das @ Ram Nagina Das @ Nageena Das @ Ram Nageena Das v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-17Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71595 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2023 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nagina Das @ Ram Nagina Das @ Nageena Das @ Ram Nageena Das S/o Late Jogeshar Das @ Jogeshwar Das @ Yogeshwar Das Resident of Village - Sishani, Police Station- Pakridayal, District- East Champaran at Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 125 of 2023 dated 09.06.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have strangulated the informant's daughter to death due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71595 of 2025(2) dt.17-11-2025 2/2 this case. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and he has no concern with the alleged offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No. 125 of 2023.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T