Shyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63424 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2018 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Shyam Yadav, S/o Ramji Prasad Yadav, R/o village- Tribhuwan Bigha, Presently resident of village- Bihari Road (Hilsa), P.S.- Hilsa, DistrictNalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Irshad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.403 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 120(B)34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has committed no offence whatsoever alleged by the prosecution. Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein it appears that the allegation against the petitioner is that he had taken benefit of the mental condition of the husband of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63424 of 2019(3) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 informant and had got him involved in purchase of two tractors and further that the petitioner has no concern with the tractors in question and the husband of the informant is engaged in a private teaching of the students, let the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No.403 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T