← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64352/2022allowed

Bhagwat Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-24Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64352 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2022 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== BHAGWAT SINGH Son of Jagdish Singh R/V- Yogipur, P.S- Gopalpur, DistGopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 24-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 376(3), 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code read with under Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that on 22.02.2021, one Vikash Kumar, with the help of petitioner fled away to Delhi with the minor daughter of the informant and made physical relationship with her daughter. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He further submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioner rather there is specific over act against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64352 of 2022(2) dt.24-02-2023 2/2 co-accused Vikash Kumar. He further submits that no offence is made out under Sections 376, 376AB, 376DA and 376DB of the IPC. He submits that the victim has been married with another person as contained in Annexure-2 of the bail application. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that no offence is made out under Sections 376, 376AB, 376DA and 376DB of the IPC, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No.20 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T