Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63760/2022allowed

Deonath Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-19Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63760 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2022 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

DEONATH SINGH SON OF LATE KUNJBIHARI SINGH R/O VILLAGEMAYAPUR, P.S.- DAUDNAGAR, DISTRICTAURANGABAD (BIHAR) 2.

ARVIND KUMAR SON OF DEONATH SINGH R/O VILLAGEMAYAPUR, P.S.- DAUDNAGAR, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lal Bahadur Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar For the informant Mr. A.K. Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 504, 426, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and further Section 302 IPC was added.

As per allegation in the FIR, several accused persons including the petitioners with a view to killl Amrendra Singh, assaulted him, as a result of which he sustained head injury and fell down unconsciously. During course of treatment, he succumbed to injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63760 of 2022(3) dt.19-04-2023 2/2 that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They have committed no offence. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners and eight other persons. As per injury report, two lacerated wounds were found on the body of deceased as well as the same in postmortem report. Injuries are superficial in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 8.8.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Daudnager in connection with Daudnager P.S. Case No. 407 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U