Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61305/2017bail granted

Ranjit Kumar @ Rakesh Chaudhary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-15Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61305 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2017 Thana- BUNIADGANJ District- Gaya ======================================================

1. Ranjit Kumar @ Rakesh Chaudhary son of Chalitar Chaudhary, resident of village Mahuar Kalan, Police Station Buniyadganj, District Gaya

2. Vinod Chaudhary son of Ram Pravesh Chaudhary, resident of village Nawada, Biju Bigha, Police Station Buniyadganj, District Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 22 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The name of the petitioners has come on the basis of secret information as per F.I.R. The source and genuineness of the secret information has not been disclosed by the prosecution.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61305 of 2017(2) dt.15-12-2017 2/2 Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 14 liters wine is recovered by the side of the house of the petitioners in abandoned stage. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. case No.186 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T