Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3451/2017allowed

Md. Sayeed @ Md. Sayub v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-12-21Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.3451 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -297 Year- 2014 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Md. Sayeed @ Md. Sayub Son of Ayub Hussain Mussa @ Ayub Resident of Village-Navinagar, P.S. Chandradip, District Jamui. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Manti Devi Wife of Jagdish Choudhary, Resident of Village-Navinagar, P.S. Chandradip, District Jamui.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Jamui, in connection with S.C./S.T. Case No. 124 of 2017, arising out of Complaint Case No.297C of 2014, registered under Sections 323/504/354B/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Complaint based allegation reveals that for land dispute relating to non-execution of the sale-deed in pursuance of agreement to sell, the case has been lodged.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3451 of 2017 (2) dt.21-12-2017 P2/ Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T