Ashok Sah @ Ashok Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63670 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2025 Thana- BAIRGACHHAI District- Araria ====================================================== Ashok Sah @ Ashok Kumar Sah S/o- Late Saukhi Lal Sah Village- Rampur Mohanpur East Bhag, Ps- Bairgachhi Dist- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Bairgachhi P.S. Case No. 23 of 2025 registered under Sections-190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 124(1), 119(1), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S.

3. According to FIR, 11 named and 5-6 unknown persons started filling the land of the informant with soil. On protest, the accused persons claimed that land and they started assaulting the informant. The specific allegation of abusing filthy languages, assaulting and outraging the modesty of the informant has been made against two accused persons namely Mayanand Rajak and Satya Narayan Rajak @ Guhalu Rajak.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63670 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 The co-accused Mayanand Rajak, Parshuram Rajak and Kanhaiya Rajak are said to have thrown acid on the face of the informant, as a result of which, she suffered injuries. The accused persons are also said to have assaulted Rabindra Singh and Upendra Singh.

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that admittedly, the reason behind the occurrence is land dispute. The further submission is that no specific overt act has been assigned against the petitioner. By drawing my attention towards the last portion of the fardbeyan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that when she was going to lodge the case, in the way, she was intercepted by the petitioner and he threatened her not to lodge the case. Learned counsel has further submitted that even on perusal of the FIR, the petitioner has no complicity in the main occurrence.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63670 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Bairgachhi P.S. Case No. 23 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T