← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63674/2025allowed

Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63674 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2019 Thana- DERNI BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Rajesh Singh @ Rajesh Kushwaha, Son of Vishwanath Mahto, R/O VillageMaiki, Udhantola, P.S.- Garkha, Distt.- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard Mr. Udai Shankar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 223 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that one Sanjay Sharma has disclosed to the police that he has sold a stolen bike to this petitioner in Rs. 6,000/-

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. His name

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63674 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Sanjay Sharma. It has also been submitted that petitioner has been framed in this case due to his criminal antecedent. From perusal of the F.I.R., it is clear that save and except the statement of Sanjay Sharma, there is nothing against the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 06.05.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chapra, Saran in connection with Derni P.S. Case No. 223 of 2019.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T