Pawan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63931 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2025 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Pawan Yadav, male, aged about-40 years, S/o Baldeo Yadav Resident of Village- Loha, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 26-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2) 115(2), 118(1) 109(1) 352, 351, 303(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused person armed with deadly weapons came at the house of the informant assaulted her using Sword causing head injury. It is also alleged that the accused persons have also took cash of Rs.10,000/- and other expensive items from the informant's house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63931 of 2025(3) dt.26-11-2025 2/2 case. He next submits that name of the petitioner has been dragged in this case due to previous land dispute which is going on between the parties. He next submits that the Medical Officer has examined the injury of the injured informant, namely, Kusumlata Devi as simple in nature which is caused by hard and blunt substance and not by sword. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2025 and has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State and informant oppose the prayer for Regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Jamui in connection with Sono P.S. Case No.139 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T