Dilip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66952 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2019 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Dilip Yadav, Son of Baijnath Yadav Resident of Village - Atwan Durg, P.S.- Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

2.

Dhrup Yadav Son of Baijnath Yadav Resident of Village - Atwan Durg, P.S.- Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

3.

Laxman Yadav @ Laxuman Yadav Son of Baijnath Yadav Resident of Village - Atwan Durg, P.S.- Hathua, District - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhilesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyavrat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 114/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is specific allegation against these petitioners that they took the deceased from his house and, subsequently, the dead body of deceased was found in the house of petitioner No. 1, therefore, considering the above facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners .

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66952 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2 Accordingly, the prayer of anticipatory bail of the petitioners stands rejected.

However, it is made clear that this order shall not cause any prejudice to the concerned court at the time of considering the regular bail application of the petitioners. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Spd/- U T