← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4737/2018dismiss for nonprosecution

Sri Subhash Chandra Thakur v. The Bank Of Baroda Through Its Chairman Cum Managaing Director And ORS

2025-06-26Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4737 of 2018 ====================================================== Sri Subhash Chandra Thakur Son of Saryu Thakur, Resident of MohallaAliganj, Upper Gangati Near, Kali Mandir, P.S.- Mojahidpur, DistrictBhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Bank Of Baroda Through Its Chairman Cum Managaing Director Regional Zonal Officer, Bihar/Jharkhand & Orissa Zone- Anand Bihar Building, 5th Floor, West Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001 2.

The Regional Manager, Bank of Baroda, Regional Office, Purnea, Ram Bagh Road, Line Bazar, Purnea.

3.

The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Bhagalpur, Branch Dr. R.P. Road, Bhagalpur- 812001.

4.

The Authorised Officer, Bank of Baroda, Purnea. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Raman Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 26-06-2025

1. The Learned counsel for the respondentBank contended that the Writ petition itself is not maintainable against the SARFAESI Act.

2. This Court has passed a detailed oral order on 25.06.2025 which reads as follows:- "1. No representation for the petitioner.

2. On perusal of the Writ petition, it is evident that the matter pertains to the notice issued under SARFAESI Act.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4737 of 2018(4) dt.26-06-2025 2/2 However, for giving a fair opportunity to the Learned counsel for the petitioner for hearing, list on 26.06.2025."

3. Inspite of it, today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) amitkr/- U