Vijay Shankar Singh @ Vijay Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64166 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2025 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Vijay Shankar Singh @ Vijay Singh S/O Late Mangal Singh @ Magal Singh Resident of Village- Khudhnukala, Devadihi, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Siddharth Harsh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Chenari P.S.Case no. 274 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed and assaulted the informant and the members of his family. The petitioner is further said to have assaulted the wife of the informant in her stomach causing injures.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case over a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64166 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 trivial dispute between the parties who are agnates as also neighbours in the village. The same would be evident from the contents of the FIR. The injuries have been found to be simple in nature except on one person and the allegation of assault on whom is not on this petitioner. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that not only the petitioner is named in the FIR but there is direct and specific allegation against him of having assaulted the informant and the members of his family including his wife causing serious injuries in her stomach.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation in the F.I.R., the contents of the order of the learned trial Court from which only one person is said to have sustained grievous injuries and the allegation of assault on whom is not on this petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Chenari P.S. Case no. 274 of 2025 on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64166 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, District- Rohtas.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T