Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60353/2019bail granted

Aalok Thakur @ Alok Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-24Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60353 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2019 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== AALOK THAKUR @ ALOK THAKUR Son of Late Sushil Thakur Resident of Mohalla- Mitralok Colony, P.S.- Buxar (M), District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2019 in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 194 of 2019 for the offence registered under Sections 25 (1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner but the same allegation has been saddled on him. It is further submitted that in the other cases as referred to in paragraph -3 of the petition, he is already in bail.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60353 of 2019(2) dt.24-10-2019 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case No. 194 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:-

1. One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

2. The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

3. The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T