← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66982/2025bail granted

Karu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66982 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2025 Thana- Pura police station District- Gaya ====================================================== Karu Singh S/o- Late Kamlesh Singh Vill- Alalpur Bishunpur PS-Pura DistGaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anunay Shahi, Advocate Ms. Chandni Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 109 and 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent but inadvertently in the order impugned, it is recorded that petitioner has antecedent of one case. It is next submitted that informant alleges that he was filling soil on vacant land when petitioner came and assaulted him by khanti causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66982 of 2025(4) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 account of land dispute. It is next submitted that from side of the petitioner Pura P.S. Case No.41 of 2025 was instituted against the informant and his side by the Bhabhi of the informant. It is further submitted that though there is allegation of assaulting the informant on head by khanti but then the blow is not alleged to be repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple in nature. It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Pura P.S. Case No.40 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T