← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21847/2018withdrawn

Ranjeet Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2023-05-04Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21847 of 2018 ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar S/o Shri Deo Prasad, R/o Pethiya Bazar, Kalli Sthan, Danapur, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna, Presently Vice President, Danapur Cantonment Board, Cantonment Danapur, Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India, through the Secretary, Minstry of Defence, South Block, New Delhi.

2.

The President, Cantonment Board, Danapur Cantonment, Danapur, Patna. 3.

The Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board, Danapur, Patna. 4.

Sh. Indra Prasad, Elected Member, Danapur Cantonment Board, Ward No.6, Danapur, Patna.

5.

Razia Sultan, Elected Member, Danapur Cantonment Board, Ward No.2, Danapur, Patna.

6.

Umesh Kumar, Elected Member, Danapur Cantonment Board, Ward No.5, Danapur, Patna.

7.

Madhu Gupta, Elected Member, Danapur Cantonment Board, Ward No.7, Danapur, Patna.

8.

Asha Devi, Elected Member, Danapur Cantonment Board, Ward No.4, Danapur, Patna.

9.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 10.

The District Magistrate, Patna-cum-Member, Danapur Cantonment Board, Danapur, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jagnnath Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prashant Pratap -GP-2 Mr. Arvind Kumar Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma Mr. Krishna Kant Singh Mr. S.D. Sanjay (Addl. Soc. Gen.) Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Union of India and learned counsel for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by

Patna High Court CWJC No.21847 of 2018(5) dt.04-05-2023 2/2 efflux of time, the writ application has become infructuous and thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U