← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71674/2022bail granted

Savitri Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71674 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2019 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Savitri Devi W/O Late Ramyatan Pandey Resident of village- Devariya Behind D.M. Office, Jahanabad, P.S. and District- Jahanabad. 2.

Rajdev Tiwari S/O Late Ramchandra Tiwari Resident of village- Devariya Behind D.M. Office, Jahanabad, P.S. and District- Jahanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Urmila Devi W/O Dinesh Kumar Resident of Village- Gyani Bigha, P.S.- Shakurabad, P.O.- Gyani Bigha, District- Jahanabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Varun Kumar Trivedi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

Case of the complainant in brief is that petitioners in connivance to each other took Rs. 3,50,000/- in the name of executing the land as per the agreement paper no. 1977 dated 30.11.2013, but they neither executed the sale deed nor returned the money.

It is submitted that petitioners have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71674 of 2022(3) dt.04-04-2023 2/2 implicated in this case and they have committed no offence. The police after investigation submitted final form against the petitioners showing the lack of evidence in this case, but differing with the same, learned court below on protest-cumcomplaint petition took cognizance on 19.05.2022. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that dispute is of purely civil in nature, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint-cum-protest petition Case No. 30 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T