Vijay Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1721 of 2018 ====================================================== Vijay Ram S/o Late Patiram Ram, resident of Village P.O.- Turk Telpa, P.S.- Bansi, District- Arwal, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Bihar 2.

The Accountant General, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

3.

The Director Cum the Joint Commissioner, Directorate General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 4.

The District Officer Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad. 5.

The District Officer, Arwal, District- Arwal. 6.

The District Development Commissioner, Arwal, District- Arwal. 7.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Jehanabad. 8.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Arwal.

9.

The Treasury Officer, Arwal, District Arwal.

10.

The Block Development Officer, Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad. 11.

The Block Development Officer, Kaler, District- Arwal. 12.

The Block Development Officer, Karpi, District- Arwal. 13.

The Block Development Officer, Sone Bhadra- Bansi Suryapur, DistrictArwal. 14.

The Block Development Officer, Kurtha, District- Arwal. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Prasad Gupta -Gp10 :

Mr. Ashok Kr. Gupta For A.G.

:

Mr. Manish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-11-2019 The learned counsel for the respondents submits that nobody has been appearing for the petitioner from the last few dates, nonetheless, the fact of the matter is that the entire retiral dues has been paid, as would be apparent from the counter

Patna High Court CWJC No.1721 of 2018(10) dt.18-11-2019 2/2 affidavit and supplementary counter affidavit filed in the present case.

Having regard to the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, since nothing survives for consideration, I deem it fit and proper to dispose off the present writ petition, however with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his subsisting grievance, if any, before the departmental authorities.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U