Babloo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67033 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2016 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Babloo Yadav S/o Late Yogendra Prasad Yadav @ Yogendra Yadav Resident of - Baidi, P.S - Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md Fazle Karim For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.T. No. 95 of 2024, arising out of Salkhua (Chiraiyan) P.S. Case No. 176 of 2016, instituted for the offences under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner along with the family members tortured and killed the deceased for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that charge has been framed on 24.04.2024.The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67033 of 2025(4) dt.14-11-2025 2/3 omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.08.2023 and has clean criminal antecedent. The Charge has been framed in this case.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. In compliance of the order dated 26.09.2025 a report has been received stating therein that the matter is at the stage of prosecution evidence. Out of 09 witnesses, 04 witnesses have been examined by the prosecution and the case is pending for evidence of remaining five witnesses.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the state of the case and also considering the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
8. Let the petitioner be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with S.T. No. 95 of 2024, arising out of Salkhua (Chiraiyan) P.S. Case No. 176 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67033 of 2025(4) dt.14-11-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U