← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./12/2018dismissed

Shankar Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-19The Chief Justice-,Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.11 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.380 of 2016 ====================================================== Shyam Nandan Prasad Sahu S/o Anandi Sahu Resident of Village - Simariya Ghat, Police Station and Anchal - Barauni, Sub-Division and District Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District Begusarai.

3. The Additional Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

5. The Circle Officer PO + PS - Barauni, District - Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Review No. 14 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.532 of 2016 ====================================================== Mundrika Jha, Son of Hare Ram Jha Resident of Village - Simariya Ghat, Police Station and Anchal - Barauni, Sub-Division and District Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District Begusarai.

3. The Additional Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

5. The Circle Officer PO + PS - Barauni, District - Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Review No. 13 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.323 of 2016 ====================================================== Shyam Kishore Jha S/o Ram Prit Jha Resident of Village - Simariya Ghat, Police Station and Anchal - Barauni, Sub-Division and District Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District Begusarai.

3. The Additional Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.11 of 2018(3) dt.19-12-2018 2/3

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

5. The Circle Officer PO + PS - Barauni, District - Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Review No. 12 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.470 of 2016 ====================================================== Shankar Sah S/o Bare Lal Sahu Resident of Village - Simariya Ghat, Police Station and Anchal - Barauni, Sub-Division and District Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District Begusarai.

3. The Additional Collector, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

4. The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Samaharnalay, PO + PS + District - Begusarai.

5. The Circle Officer PO + PS - Barauni, District - Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Kr Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-12-2018 Defects are ignored.

We have proceeded to hear Shri Ravindra Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the applicants.

These review applications have been filed praying for review of the judgment dated 29th November, 2017 passed in L.P.A. No. 323 of 2016 and other analogous matters. Having gone through the judgment and keeping in

Patna High Court C. REV. No.11 of 2018(3) dt.19-12-2018 3/3 view the principles of review, we do not find any such error apparent on the face of record so as to entertain these applications keeping in view the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Sasi (Dead) through legal representatives Vs. Aravindakshan Nair and others, reported in (2017) 4 SCC

692. In view of the ratio thereof, we have not been able to decipher any such ground that may allow us to invoke our power of review.

Hence, the applications are rejected.

(Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) P.K.P./-R.S.Sen U