Md. Dilshad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65770 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2025 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Dilshad S/O Md. Habib Resident of Village- Makrampur, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 99 of 2025 dated 12.06.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) (3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused assaulted the informant's son and snatched rupees ten thousand as well as gold chain worth Rs. 86,000/-. Further, in the afaternoon at about 3:30 pm they arrived at the door of the informant and started abusing and made five-six round of firing with intention to kill.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is case and counter case between the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65770 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 parties. Counter case bearing Sakri P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025 has been lodged by accused Md. Nehal Akhtar, against the informant and others. It is submitted that the occurrence has taken place due to some quarrel between two groups on the point of playing cricket. It is submitted that no one has been injured in the said occurrence. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner has one criminal case against him.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 99 of 2025, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhubani, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S..

(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T