Manoj Paswan @ Manoj Kumar @ Mansraj Paswan@ Mansraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66386 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2024 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Manoj Paswan @ Manoj Kumar @ Mansraj Paswan@ Mansraj kumar Son of Lalit Paswan R/o Village - Sanskrit Nirmali, Ward no. - 9, P.S. - Balua Bazar, District - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 03/2024 dated 10.01.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, two unknown miscreants are alleged to have intercepted the motorcycle of the informant and looted Rs. 2,000/-, a mobile phone, PAN Card, Aadhar Card on the point of pistol and fled away with the motorcycle of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66386 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the course of investigation. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 07.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70831/2024. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul in connection with Bhimpur P.S. Case No. 03/2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T