Nandjee Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65411 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2025 Thana- TARARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.
Nandjee Singh, aged about 42 years, (Male) Son of Sidhnath Singh, 2.
Abhishek Kumar, aged about 20 years, (Male) Son of Nandjee Singh 3.
Sumanto Devi @ Sumanti Devi, aged about 39 Years, (Female) Wife of Nandjee Singh All are Resident of Village - Badhsera, Police Station - Tarari, District - Bhojpur (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No. 114 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 74, 117(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners along with other accused persons, had assaulted the informant and her daughter causing injury.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65411 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners and informant are agnate and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in their self-defence, petitioners may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and her daughter without intention. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR, the learned District Court is directed to call for the final opinion of the doctor in respect of the injury sustained by the informant and her daughter and if the injury on the vital part of the body, i.e. the head is found to be simple in nature, then in that case, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65411 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 Judicial Magistrate- 1st, Bhojpur, Ara/ court concerned, in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No. 114 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioners as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T