← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16434/2022dismissed

Asha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16434 of 2022 ====================================================== Asha Devi wife of Raju Prasad resident of village- Siyarbhukka, P.O. and P.S.- Chakand, District- Gaya, Bihar, Pin- 804404. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Patna. 3.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Gaya.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Gaya.

5.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Gaya. 6.

Madhuri Devi wife of Shankar Prasad resident of village- Siyarbhukka, P.O. and P.S.- Chakand, District- Gaya, Bihar, Pin- 804404. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kunal Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms.Kumari Amrita ( Gp 3 ) Mr.Mirtyunjay Kumar, AC to GP-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) That the instant writ application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs,order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of certiorari for directing and commanding the respondents authorities to cancel the appointment of respondent no.6 i.e.

Madhuri Devi who got appointed on basis of forged documents.

(ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of

Patna High Court CWJC No.16434 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2 mandamus to set aside the order dated 06.09.2018 passed by the appellate authority i.e. District Programme Officer."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U