Vinod Sindhaniya @ Vinod Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66426 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Vinod Sindhaniya @ Vinod Kumar Yadav S/O Hanslal Rai R/O VillageJitaura, P.S- Madhuban, Distt.- East Champaran. 2.
Prince Kumar S/O Vinod Sindhaniya @ Vinod Kumar Yadav R/O VillageJitaura, P.S- Madhuban, Distt.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, Petitioner No. 1 is alleged to have inflicted knife blow upon the informant and Petitioner No. 2 is alleged to have assaulted informant with fists.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66426 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. The present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 6 days and there is no plausible explanation for the delay which itself falsifies the entire prosecution case. As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, scuffle took place between the parties. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, as simple in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, delay in lodging of the F.I.R. and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Madhuban P.S.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66426 of 2025(4) dt.28-11-2025 3/3 Case No. 58 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T