Sadre Alam @ Md. Sadre Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64421 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ GRP CASE DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Sadre Alam @ Md. Sadre Alam S/o Late Abdul Hakim @ Late Mohammad Hakim Miyan R/o - Sain, Ward No. - 5, P.S - Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Indrajeet Bhushan For the State :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Rail P.S. Thawe Case No. 15 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 317(4) and 317(5) of the BNS and Sections 20/22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 07.03.2025, police apprehended the petitioner and one co-accused person at Thawe railway station after they attempted to flee. Upon their arrest, officers recovered several mobile phones, stolen personal stuff and 54 intoxicated tablets. The apprehended persons including the petitioner confessed to a pattern of drugging travelers' tea or food to steal their belongings.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64421 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that that the petitioner is innocent and falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The fact is that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner was returning from Lucknow and was on Thawe railway station for catching a train for Muzaffarpur. The petitioner is in custody since 09.03.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner has five criminal antecedents. 32 pieces of intoxicated tablets and some stolen articles have been recovered from possession of the petitioner and allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other, used to make the passengers unconscious by consuming intoxicated tablets and then they used to steal their stuff.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the gravity of the allegation, in my view, the petitioner does not deserve bail. Accordingly, it is rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T