Nasim Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64438 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2025 Thana- DHANARUA District- Patna ====================================================== Nasim Bind son of Santoshi Bind Resident of Village -Kishunganj PSDhanarua District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case no.207 of 2025 registered under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the five named accused persons are said to have come variously armed, to have abused the informant and others and the petitioner is said to have given a blow with an iron rod causing grievous injury on the head of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties. The manner of occurrence

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64438 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 is other than what has been narrated if the FIR. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R., there being direct allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted the informant with an iron rod upon his head and the corresponding injury of fracture of the skull having been found on the informant as discussed in the order of the learned trial Court, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and the application is rejected.

7. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the learned Court below within a period of four weeks.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T