Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72671 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2024 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Singh Son of Nathun Singh R/O Vill.- Neema Chaturbhuj, P.S.- Rafiganj, Dist.- Aurangabad, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rita Verma- A.P.P.
Mr. Y. C. Verma- Sr. Advocate Ms. Priyanka Singh- Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned senior counsel for the informant.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Rafiganj P. S. Case No.178 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 506 of the I.P.C.
3.
The learned APP submits that the offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72671 of 2024(4) dt.22-03-2025 2/2 that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing, but then, the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C, on which the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). 5.
In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). 6.
The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T