Sarju Prasad @ Saryu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60860 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2042 Year-2014 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Sarju Prasad @ Saryu Prasad Son of Late Sahdeo Prasad Resident of Mohalla- Shivpuri Colony, Road No.-5, Opposite A.N. College, Katari Hill Road, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Buddhist Thai- Bharat Society having its registered office at VillageMastipur, South of Main Temple, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya (Bihar), through its General Secretary, Ven. Ratneshwar Chakma, Son of Sri Santi Kumar Chakma, residing at Buddhist Thai- Bharat Society, VillageMastipur, South of Main Temple, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indu Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner is in custody in connection with Complaint Case No. 2042 of 2014 for the offence under sections 406, 504, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is aged about 85 years. He submits that there is fake allegation that some donation was received by the organization but instead of depositing the amount in the account of Buddhist Thai-Bharat Society it was deposited in the personal account.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60860 of 2019(2) dt.27-09-2019 2/2 Learned counsel submits that petitioner is no more connected with the affairs of the Buddhist Thai-Bharat Society. He left his office long back.

Considering the fact that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is aged about 85 years, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2042 of 2014 subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be government employee. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U T