← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64435/2025bail granted

Nuzhat Bano @ Nuzhat Ara v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64435 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2025 Thana- Sahayak Khajanchi District- Purnia ====================================================== 1 .

Nuzhat Bano @ Nuzhat Ara W/o Md. Hannan R/o - Sajjad Colony Rizwan Masjid, Ward No. 28, P.S - Sahayak Khazanchi, District - Purnia 2.

Shamim Akhtar @ Md. Shamim S/o Md. Hannan R/o - Sajjad Colony Rizwan Masjid, Ward No. 28, P.S - Sahayak Khazanchi, District - Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 80 ( 2 ) and and 3(5) of BNS.

3 . As per prosecution case , daughter of informant was married to co-accused Md. Shahanbaj in the year 2020 and after the marriage , she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and ultimately the accused persons committed the murder of informant's daughter.

4. Petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64435 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/2 is brother-in -law of the deceased. They are simply victim of over implications. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with deceased and her husband. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceasedwho is already in custody since 17.03.2025 . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Purnea in connection with Sahayak Khazanchi P.S. Case No. 75 of 2025 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T