← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63201/2019bail granted

Kranti Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2020-05-29Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63201 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2019 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Kranti Singh Son of Umesh Singh Resident of Village - Laualagam, P.S. - Chousa, District - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s R.K.Singh Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-05-2020 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 28.3.2019 in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No. 70/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366(A)/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code was added. The prosecution claims that petitioner and one coaccused were seen over the place of occurrence when the victim was found missing but minutely perusal of the first information report as well as statement of sole eye witness Rajesh Mandal go to show that petitioner and co-accused had left the place of occurrence prior to missing of victim.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63201 of 2019(5) dt.29-05-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura/concerned court in connection with Chousa P.S. Case No. 70/2019 (S.T. No. 182 of 2019).

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to make available sureties due to lock down as well as due to prevailing situation, the concerned court shall release the petitioner provisionally on personal bond with condition that petitioner shall furnish the sureties when lock down is over. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Spd/- U T