← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2257/2022disposed

Vinay Kumar Jha, v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Yogendra Singh,

2024-03-21Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2257 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15396 of 2021 ====================================================== Vinay Kumar Jha, Son of Sri Sita Ram Jha, Resident of Village - Siripur Gahar, P.S. - Khanpur, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Yogendra Singh, the District Magistrate, Samastipur.

2.

Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh, The Deputy Development Commissioner, Samastipur.

3.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, The Sub Divisional Officer, Samastipur, Patna. 4.

Mr. Anugarh Narayan Singh, The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Samastipur.

5.

Mr. Gauri Kumar, The Block Development Officer, Khanpur, District - Samastipur.

6.

Mr. Ram Narayan Thakur, The Chairman/Secretary Ward Implementation and Management Committee Ward No. 1 to 5 Gram Panchayat Raj, Siripur Gahar, East Block - Khanpur, District - Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 21-03-2024 The present M.J.C. / Contempt petition is filed for non-compliance of order dated 13.09.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15396 of 2021.

2. Limited direction is asking the petitioner to submit representation within a period of four weeks from 13.09.2021. Petitioner is stated to have submitted representation on 06.10.2021, whereas the respondents have passed order on

Patna High Court MJC No.2257 of 2022 dt.21-03-2024 2/2 16.03.2024. There is a enormous delay in complying the orders of this Court. There is no application or review petition insofar as seeking extension of time in the order dated 13.09.2021 insofar as compliance within a period of three months. It is to be noted that three months have elapsed as on 05.01.2022. The respondents have taken two years and few days in complying the orders of this Court.

3. Having regard to the compliance, it is not appropriate to initiate Contempt of Court proceedings. On the other hand, petitioner is entitled to litigation cost. Litigation cost is quantified at Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand). Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

4. Accordingly, the present M.J.C/Contempt petition stands dropped, reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 16.03.2024 (Annexure-E) to Supplementary Show Cause filed on behalf of the respondent.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) manish/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A Uploading Date 22.03.2024 Transmission Date NA