Md. Haider Ali @ Haidar Ali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68619 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2024 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Haider Ali @ Haidar Ali S/o Late Imamuddin Resident of mohalla B 108, Jhuggi Sarai Papal Thala Adarsh Naar, P.S. - Mahendra Park, Districtnorth west Delhi 110033, at present resident of village- Dharhara, PSAndharamath, District- Madhubani, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Shah Nawaz Ali, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Andharamath P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that one country made musket (gun) made of wood and iron was recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68619 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. It is further submitted that the recovered gun is likely to be a play gun used by the children of the family and the same is not dangerous to human body. The petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Andharamath P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T