Praduman Kumar Yadav @ Praduman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12995 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2017 Thana- SINGHESHWARASHTHAN DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== Praduman Kumar Yadav @ Praduman Kumar, S/o Madan Yadav, Resident of Village- Pathraha, P.S.- Singheshwar, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-06-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Singheshwar P.S.Case No. 129 of 2017 registered under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian penal Code. Allegation in brief is that petitioner and one another person apprehended after chase by the local people while fleeing away after robbing the motorcycle and mobile of the informant and recovery of motorcycle and mobile were made though two other escaped away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that entire prosecution story is false and fabricated as an accident took place in between the motorcycles of both sides due to which they indulged into scuffle thereafter petitioner has been falsely implicated.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12995 of 2018(4) dt.18-06-2018 2/2 Whereas learned counsel for the State submits that after robbing the informant immediately thereafter petitioner was apprehended and recovery was made; moreover, he has a number of criminal antecedents.

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Court is not persuaded to grant bail to the petitioner in view of recovery of motorcycle and mobile and large number of criminal antecedents of similar nature.

(Arun Kumar, J) sujit/- U T