Dinanath Rai @ Dinanath Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66222 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
Dinanath Rai @ Dinanath Ray S/o- Birath Rai R/V- Chandpur Dhamoun W.No-1, Ps- Shahpur Patori Dist- Samastipur 2.
Babita Devi W/o- Birath Rai R/V- Chandpur Dhamoun W.No-1, Ps- Shahpur Patori Dist- Samastipur 3.
Dinesh Rai @ dinesh Kumar Rai D/o- Birath Rai R/V- Chandpur Dhamoun W.No-1, Ps- Shahpur Patori Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the application on behalf of the petitioner no. 1 namely, Dinanath Rai.
3. The permission is granted.
4. The application on behalf of the petitioner no. 1 is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. The petition now only survives against petitioner nos. 2 and 3.
6. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66222 of 2025(2) dt.19-09-2025 2/3 with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case no. 151 of 2025, registered under Sections 103(1), 3 (5) of the B.N.S.
7. The allegation in the first information is that the daughter of the informant was done to death after 10 years of marriage on account of some matrimonial discord.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would apparent from the first information report itself that the basic dispute was between the deceased and her husband which had even continued after 10 years of marriage. So far as the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, they are the mother-in-law and brother-in-law(Dewar) of the deceased and no specific allegation has been made against them. The dispute between the parties also stands compromised by way of compromise petition.
9 . The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
10. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that the petitioners nos. 2 and 3 are the mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased who are also taking care of the three children born out of the wedlock of the deceased and her husband, let the above named petitioner nos. 2 and 3 who have no criminal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66222 of 2025(2) dt.19-09-2025 3/3 antecedent, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Shahpur Patori P.S. Case no. 151 of 2025, on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Shahpur Patori, District-Samastipur, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023. (Soni Shrivastava, J) krishnakant/- U T