Rohan Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65902 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2024 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

Rohan Tiwari Son of Guard Tiwari Resident of Rasulpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Distirct - Vaishali.

2.

Raja Tiwari Son of Arun Tiwari Resident of Rasulpur, P.S. - Lalganj, Distirct - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 362 of 2024, S.Tr. No. 204 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case is that on 16.05.2024, while the informant was returning home after withdrawing 1,40,000/- from Punjab National Bank, two miscreants on a ₹ motorcycle forcibly snatched his bag containing cash, cheque book, mobile, and other articles.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65902 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/3 the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioners has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Gard Tiwari. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioners have no concern with the looted articles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 09.12.2024 and have five criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 362 of 2024, S.Tr. No. 204 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65902 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(III) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T