Rina Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14722 of 2023 ====================================================== Rina Kumari Wife of Sanjay Yadav Resident of Village-Jhuriya, Gampanchayat-Khutupar Ward No.-13, Post-Pacham, P.s.-Lakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

4.

The District Program Officer, Lakhisarai.

5.

The C.D.PO, Lakhisarai.

6.

Runi Kumari Wife of Prabhat Kumar Resident of Vilage-Khutupar, PSLakhisarai, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Md. Raisul Haque, SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-03-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for quashing of the order dated- 14- 09-2022, passed by the District Magistrate Lakhisarai issued vide Memo No1201/Legal Dated-16-9-2022 in Aaganwadi Appeal No.- 07/2019 rejecting the appeal against the order dated-8-3- 19, passed by the District Programme Officer (herein in short referred as DPO) Lakhisarai issued vide Memo No- 335/Pr. Dated- 8-3-2019, in connection with public Complaint No- 62/2018, whereby the said authority has rejected the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14722 of 2023(2) dt.28-03-2024 2/2 application of the petitioner relating to irregularities in the selection process and illegal selection of Private Respondent No.-6 whereas the petitioner is legally entitled for selection as per the merit list and direct the respondents for selection of the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika in Gram Panchayat Raj Khutupar, Ward No- 13, District- Lakhisarai."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U