Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70801/2023allowed

Arjun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-28Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70801 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-392 Year-2023 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== ARJUN KUMAR S/O SHYAM BABU RAM R/O VILLAGENARAYANPUR BUJURG, P.S.- MAHUA DISTRICT-VAISHALI AT HAJIPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, on receiving secret information that some miscreants are assembled and planned to commit a crime, thereafter the police party reached there and there has been recovery of one country-made pistol and two live cartridges from possession of the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70801 of 2023(2) dt.28-11-2023 2/2 committed no offence. Petitioner was apprehended on spot. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged arms and cartridges, which were seized by the police. Only on the basis of suspicion, petitioner has implicated in the present case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 29.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 392 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T