Azad Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.8054 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2016 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Azad Ansari, son of Late Gul Mohammad Ansari, resident of Mohalla- Neel Kothi, P.s.- Dehri-on-Sone, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the informant : Ms. Ranjana Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2017, arising out of Dehri (T) P.S.Case No. 174 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 326 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is named in the FIR no specific overt act has been alleged against him but later on after two months allegation has been leveled against the petitioner that he has cut neck of the injured but learned counsel for the petitioner has doubted the injury report which has been obtained from Bose Clinic, which is a private clinic and not a Government Hospital and, as such, no
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8054 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 2/2 reliance can be placed on the same and other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court in Cr.Misc.No. 52184 of 2016 vide order dated 13.1.2017.
Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant also, who have opposed the prayer for bail stating that treatment of the injured is going on and the case has been committed to the court of sessions.
Having heard both sides and considering the injury report, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, as the case has been committed to the court of sessions, learned trial court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial within a period of nine months. If the trial is not concluded within the said period, the petitioners may renew his prayer for bail before the court below.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U