Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64347/2025bail rejected

Surendra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-16Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64347 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

Surendra Chaudhary S/o Late Chhote Lal Chaudhary R/o Village - Katesar, Post - Katesar, P.S - Bihta, District - Patna 2.

Harsh Kumar S/o Pramod Mahto R/o Village - Singhara, Post - Kamla Gopalpur, P.S - Maner, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, Petitioner No. 1 is registered owner and Petitioner No. 2 is driver of the seized tempo from which parts of the seized boat were recovered.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. No incriminating

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64347 of 2025(2) dt.16-09-2025 2/2 article has been recovered from possession of these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that Petitioner No. 1 is owner and Petitioner No. 2 is driver of the seized tempo from which parts of the boat seized by the police were recovered.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of accusation the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T