← Library
Patna High Court/66200/2022partly allowed disposal

Sanoj Sahu @ Saroj Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-25Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66200 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2022 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

SANOJ SAHU @ SAROJ SAHU S/O JHAVAR SAHU @ JHAWAR SAHU Resident of Village- Kumai, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga. 2.

RAM KUMARI DEVI W/O TRIVENI YADAV Resident of Village- Kumai, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga.

3.

RINKU DEVI W/O SHIV NARAYAN YADAV Resident of Village- Kumai, P.S.- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504/34 IPC. As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. named accused persons poured hot oil and chilli powder upon the informant's side and assaulted them by lathi and broom.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66200 of 2022(2) dt.25-02-2023 2/3 taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Earlier, the co-accused has filed case against the informant, thereafter, the present F.I.R. has been lodged by the informant. It is submitted that Saroj Sahu and Satya Narayan Yadav are alleged to have thrown hot oil over the body of Firoz but the said Satya Narayan Yadav has already been enlarged on bail by the court below itself. The injury was found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that according to the F.I.R. itself, allegation against the petitioner no.1 is that he poured hot oil on the body of Firoj. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is specific allegation against petitioner no.1 namely Saroj Sahu to pour hot oil upon the body of Firoz, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner no.1 on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. However, since the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioner nos.2 and 3, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66200 of 2022(2) dt.25-02-2023 3/3 of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No.40 of 2022, G.R. No.113/2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T