← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3299/2017disposed

Nagendra Nath Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2026-07-27Mr. Justice Kumar Manish2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3299 of 2017 ====================================================== Nagendra Nath Singh S/o late Rambachan Singh Resident of MohallaPatandevi Chauraha, P.S. Alamganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principle Secretary, Finance Department , Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Under Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director Printing and Stationary, Secretariat Printing Press, Gulzar Bagh, Patna-7 5.

The Superintendent , Government Printing Press, Gulzar Bagh, Patna-7 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anju Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Parijat Saurav, AC to AAG 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH ORAL ORDER 27-07-2026 Heard Ms. Anju Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parijat Saurav, learned AC to AAG 13 for the State.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances of the petitioner has been redressed except that there has been recovery of amount of Rs. 21,265/- from the gratuity of the petitioner which has been arbitrary and illegally recovered. Although, there is no prayer in the writ application regarding the same.

3. This writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority (respondent no. 5), i.e. The Superintendent, Government Printing Press,

Patna High Court CWJC No.3299 of 2017(8) dt.27-07-2026 2/2 Gulzar Bagh, Patna-7, and if the petitioner files a representation before the respondent no. 5 within one month from the date of passing of this order, respondent no. 5 shall consider the same in light of the judgment passed in the case of Civil Appeal No. 7115 of 2010 dated 02.05.2022 (Thomas Daniel vs. State of Kerela & Ors.) after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

4. This writ petition is disposed off with aforesaid direction.

(Kumar Manish, J) Ranjeet/- U